|
You should look at the authorization lists on the remote system. If a user is not in the list, he/she will get the file not found kind of thing. Might be the main issue here. Keeping security synchronized over multiple systems may be harder than synchronizing the data. You SHOULD be able to have only one copy of the data, esp. since it's read-only access. Any more than 1 is maintenance nightmare time. I'd bet there are specific messages to respond to if someone has a record locked on the remote file. I heartily recommend getting at the Distributed Database manuals, one for Management and one for Programming Dist DB. They'e accessible at InfoCenter. Or go directly to this URl <http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/html/as400/online/v4r5eng.htm> for hte v4r5 manuals. Luck At 03:14 PM 4/10/02 -0500, you wrote: -snip- > >> What does "locked down tight" mean exactly ???? >That systems has tighter security by authorization lists. The others aren't >to that level of security.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
