|
And here's something along the same lines - using the program itself as lock object - from the archives: http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/199911/msg01701.html Best regards, Carsten Flensburg ----- Original Message ----- From: "York, Albert" <albert.york@nissan-usa.com> To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 7:16 PM Subject: RE: Monitor for existing job. > This would cause a problem if the job ends abnormally. > > If I understand correctly, the purpose is to really check for an active > process rather than an active job per se. > > I use the procedure of locking a data area. This has worked well for me for
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.