|
From: Nathan M. Andelin <nandelin@relational-data.com> > > From: "Chuck Lewis" > > See you got that email too. > They sent me an email too. One interesting side-note. According to Dave > Slater at IBM, one of his goals is to "Convert the WebFacing runtime support > so that WebFaced applications run in batch mode and avoid the > cost/performance penalties associated with interactive execution." > > The question is how will IBM do it? The easiest solution would be for IBM > to do something like FAST400, which would be to set the bit that currently > flags a Webfaced job as interactive. they already use this bit to govern things like Domino-only boxes, so you may be on the right track here.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.