|
Good one, Vern! I emailed Larry as well, and responded to a few posts in the discussion area. Good catch, Chuck. Hope we can get a bunch of us to respond! Dan Bale SAMSA, Inc. 989-790-0507 DBale@SAMSA.com <mailto:DBale@SAMSA.com> Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Vernon Hamberg Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:46 PM To: larry@larryseltzer.com Subject: 64-bit Read your article, "Whatever happened to 64-bit computing?", with interest. Some comments: 1. IBM's AS/400 has had fully 64-bit systems for 5-6 years now. And something like the 'revolutionary' programming techniques, like >The trick to making 64-bits desirable is to design new types of >applications that make use of them. Consider that obscenely large address >space I described earlier: What if we were to design memory-mapped file >systems? Imagine that you didn't have to open and close files, but that >you manipulated them through data structures directly, and that it was the >operating system's job to page the data into and out of memory as-needed. >64-bit addresses are still large enough to handle any file system. It >makes a lot of programming a lot easier. has been used on this 'dinosaur' machine since its inception 20 years ago. It's called single-level-store, i.e., all memory and disk are one address space. No need to program segments, they don't exist at the abstract layer exposed to developers. 2. >people are going to be most concerned initially with running their >existing code on them, and on porting it to the new architectures Code written on the System/38 20 years ago will run, without change (on the part of developers - there's an automatic conversion at the lowest level), on any AS/400 (iSeries) today. No porting needed. Nada. Zilch. Thanks Vern Hamberg Would you like to see a challenging little arithmetic puzzle that might get you or your kids or grandkids more interested in math? Go to <http://cgi.wff-n-proof.com/MSQ-Ind/I-1E.htm> Sillygism-- Something is better than nothing. Nothing is better than a ham sandwich. Ergo Something is better than a ham sandwich. _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.