RE: V5R1 Install Changes

["Dan Bale" <dbale@xxxxxxxxx>]

>Basically, we couldn't do everything needed
>at V5R1, so we staged the implementation.

JMHO, But it seems to me that Software Installation is CRITICAL enough that
we shouldn't have to deal with IBM "implementing in stages".  I wonder how
Jeff Crosby feels about this.  So we can figure, maybe, that the v5r2
installation "manual" will be self-contained and complete?  Or maybe not?

Dan Bale
SAMSA, Inc.
989-790-0507
DBale@SAMSA.com <mailto:DBale@SAMSA.com>
  Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
  (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
[mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Neil Palmer
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:48 PM
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Subject: Re: V5R1 Install Changes


FYI - reply from IBM re V5R1 Software Installation Manual changes /
InfoCenter..

----- Forwarded by Neil Palmer/DPS on 2002/03/19 12:44 -----


"Anne Lucas" <alucas@us.ibm.com>
2002/03/19 10:21


        To:     neilp@dpslink.com
        cc:
        Subject:        Re: V5R1 Install Changes


Feel free to distribute this .....  thanks!

                      Jerry Barry
                                               To:      Anne
Lucas/Birmingham/IBM@IBMUS
                      03/18/2002 05:45         cc:
                      PM                       From:    Jerry
Barry/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS
                                               Subject: Re: V5R1 Install
Changes(Document link: Anne)


Ann,  We've heard this before!  Basically, we couldn't do everything
needed
at V5R1, so we staged the implementation.  Here is a more detailed
analysis:
  <snip>