RE: ODBC performance with UPS Worldship -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: ODBC performance with UPS Worldship
From: Dave Murvin <davem@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 11:43:21 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

At 08:20 PM 3/14/2002, Steve wrote:
>What speed lines between the pc and 400 ?  I have seen dramatic improvement
>in odbc performance ( 45 seconds to 7 seconds ) after a 56kb line was
>upgraded to a much faster speed.

The UPS PCs are all direct connected through the network, even for the
remote locations.

I may look at the odbc tracing if some of the other suggestions do not work.

Thanks.

Dave Murvin
DRM Enterprises, Inc.
davem@drme.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.