|
>From: rob@dekko.com >(snip) >We have no local printers. All of our printers are network attached - >ethernet. This way all PC's can easily share them, and they can be >configured directly on the 400 also. > >But back in the bad old days of twinax you could do some weird stuff with >Client Access. Like configure a local printer as a system printer. Then >other PC's could print to that system printer and get stuff to print on >that printer. When you have an AS/400 mindset and are ignorant of the PC >capabilities, or had DOS pc's, it worked. >(snip) Rob, that's a rather condecending attitude. While I agree that network attached printers provide more flexibility, some shops are probably too small to convert all of their PC-attached printers over. So going with Client Access (or some other emulator vendor) is a matter of practicality, not "ignorance." To address the question, we have a mix of PC-attached and HP JetDirect network-attached printers. We use Client Access Express to configure PC-attached printers and we use remote writers to print directly to the networked ones. On the Mac side, we've used MochaSoft. _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.