× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Now that you mention it, there is a job that uses CRTDUPOBJ to create a copy
in QTEMP.

I will change the WAITFILE time. I don't care if the batch job is delayed,
as long as it completes normally.


Albert


        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Vernon Hamberg [SMTP:vhamberg@mn.mediaone.net]
        Sent:   Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:48 AM
        To:     midrange-l@midrange.com
        Subject:        Re: Help with a file allocation problem

        Could there be a SAV or CRTDUPOBJ going on?

        "York, Albert" wrote:
        >
        > Hmmmm. I don't know how someone would get a SHRNUP lock on the
file. Unless
        > the CPYF is also running in another job (which could happen).
Perhaps I
        > should override the file and change the WAITFILE parameter before
the copy.
        >
        > Albert
        >
        >         -----Original Message-----
        >         From:   Vernon Hamberg [SMTP:vhamberg@mn.mediaone.net]
        >         Sent:   Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:36 AM
        >         To:     midrange-l@midrange.com
        >         Subject:        Re: Help with a file allocation problem
        >
        >         If someone has a *SHRNUP on the file (or member), you
could not add
        > to
        >         it.
        >
        >         As for timeout, there's a WAITFILE that defaults to
*IMMED. WAITRCD
        >         defaults to 60. Sounds like you're hit by a file lock, not
a record
        >         lock.
        >
        >         "York, Albert" wrote:
        >         >
        >         > I thought about that but why should I need to allocate
the object
        > for a CPYF
        >         > *ADD? And why does it immediately time out?
        >         >
        >         >
        >
        --
        Vern Hamberg

        Would you like to see a challenging little arithmetic puzzle
        that might get you or your kids or grandkids more interested
        in math? Go to <http://cgi.wff-n-proof.com/MSQ-Ind/I-1E.htm>

        Sillygism--

        Something is better than nothing.
        Nothing is better than a ham sandwich.
        Ergo
        Something is better than a ham sandwich.
        _______________________________________________
        This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L)
mailing list
        To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
        To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
        visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
        or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
        Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
        at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.