×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
One of our network people came over today, and asked me about this issue.  I
was wondering where I could get IBM's response about this problem... Does
anybody have a link, or more information so I can check to see if we need to
be concerend...

Thanks, tim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: RayPeterson [SMTP:RayPeterson@gmx.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:38 PM
> To:   midrange-l@midrange.com
> Subject:      RE: SNMP Security flaw-and IBM response
>
> Jim...
>
> I think the issue for all of us is broader that just our potential iSeries
> vulnerabilities.  We do though still need a clear response from IBM on
> iSeries and other servers beyond the unix base they've talked about so
> far.
>
> SNMPv2 is not supported by Cisco, but for many of us snmp on Cisco is
> strategic and cannot just be turned off.  We use both Cisco routers and
> switches.  Then again, I'd bet we have snmp running on some systems where
> we
> aren't even using it.
>
> Today's SANS NewsBites (see below) suggests many organizations are
> following
> a four-step action plan to improve security.  This is an opportunity for
> SANS to encourage us to improve security generally by promoting the SANS
> "top twenty".  I did the top 20 review during the NIMDA chaos but I'm
> going
> to review it again, especially looking at the new servers we've added
> since
> then.
>
> They are also making available a tool to help find the Cisco
> vulnerabilities.  There is a webcast next Wednesday to introduce that
> tool.
>
> Ray
>
>
> From: Alan for the SANS NewsBites service
> Re:   February 13 SANS NewsBites
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> The widespread SNMP vulnerabilities appear to be a wake-up call. Many
> organizations are following a four-step action plan to fix more than
> just the immediate problem:
> 1.Patch the systems on which you have to run SNMP
> 2.Turn off SNMP on the systems where you don't.
> 3.See which of the other "Top Twenty Internet Security Vulnerabilities"
> (www.sans.org/top20.htm) your organization has not protected against,
> and make it right.
> 4.Check your Cisco routers for the other important vulnerabilities
> uncovered by the NSA and SANS, and correct those flaws.
>
> SANS and the Center for Internet Security are making available a
> new free tool to help you find the Cisco vulnerabilities.  We have
> rescheduled the web broadcast, in which the tool's main authors will
> show you what the tool does and how it works, for next Wednesday,
> February 20 at 1:00 PM EST (1800 GMT). The change in date is to give
> you time to get all your SNMP problems solved before you move on to
> the other Cisco security issues.
>
>
>                                   Alan
>
> **********************************************************************
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
> [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Jim Franz
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:31 PM
> To: midrange-l@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: SNMP Security flaw-and IBM response
>
>
> can anyone identify the snmp version on the iSeries?
> We have read in prev posts that IBM say's generically" it is unaffected
> but I have people asking for more detail. Some news stories have
> said get to level 2, other level 3 of the snmp protocol.
>
> btw - some have complained (both to CERT.org & IBM) that the iSeries
> is never mentioned or referenced. To IBM i would say "you keep telling
> us we've got a great server & can play in the "real" world with a
> standards
> based system", yet you leave us in the dark in the security area. I see
> the
> protocols I use every day (http, telnet, ftp, pop, snmp, etc) listed in
> CERTS
> and all I can do is pray you've got it covered. (took years to get the old
> security flawed DNS updated!) CERT answered me back and said it's up to
> the vendor to participate. How about it ???
> Went to the iSereis support site - searched "snmp AND security" - nothing
> relevent. The rest of the world is paying attention to this!
> jim franz
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.