|
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Roger, this is not my area of expertise, so take accordingly My understanding is that SSL is only relevant if the particular tcpip appl you have now and you want to use (e.g. telnet, ftp etc), is explicitly enabled for SSL (at both ends), wheras a VPN can provide a secure "tunnel" for any tcp application. Its not a given that all tcp appl's support ssl, or the particular one you have at either end does. Some products don't support it and some may charge extra for the feature. Rod Orr -----Original Message----- From: Roger Vicker, CCP [mailto:rvicker@vicker.com] For an AS/400 (V5R1M0) tucked behind a firewall would using SSL be that much more of a risk than using the firewall's VPN upgrade and clients? By opening the needed SSL ports and issuing the certificates the cost would be minor compared to VPN. The expected users would not need access to other protected network resources so that added capability of VPN is not needed.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.