|
No, the philosophy is that there is a quicker time to find and fix those bugs, which leads to overall fewer bugs. Imagine the amount of bugs found in Windows if MS released source code. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@leif.org> To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:32 PM Subject: Re: Which OS is more secure ? > From: Booth Martin <booth@MartinVT.com> > > About Linux... of course there's more vulnerabilities. Their development is > > done in the open air, not controlled labs as is the case with commercial > > development. > > Ah, but it is PRECISELY the argument of the Open Source folks that > the very openness means FEWER bugs.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.