|
From: "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@leif.org> > as I have stated many times before: it is wrong to blame > IBM's poor marketing for the demise of the 400 > (umm: e(logo)server iSeries). IBM *want* to get > rid of the 400, to make it go away, so what they do > (or don't do in this case) makes perfect sense and > is not inept in any way. Why would IBM *want* the 400 to go away? Surely, you're joking. But this isn't the first time you've said it. What's your rationale? Thanks, Nathan M. Andelin www.relational-data.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.