From: "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@leif.org>
> as I have stated many times before: it is wrong to blame
> IBM's poor marketing for the demise of the 400
> (umm: e(logo)server iSeries). IBM *want* to get
> rid of the 400, to make it go away, so what they do
> (or don't do in this case) makes perfect sense and
> is not inept in any way.

Why would IBM *want* the 400 to go away?  Surely, you're joking.  But this
isn't the first time you've said it.  What's your rationale?

Thanks,

Nathan M. Andelin
www.relational-data.com




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.