RE: Use of a trigger...? is this areasonable?

["Booth Martin" <Booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

--
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Well...  yes Rob, you're right.  Thats why I decided I'd better be listening
to the folks on this list.  The problem is one of those trivial things that
becomes a dark cloud of misery for months afterwards.



---------------------------------------------------------
Booth Martin   http://www.MartinVT.com
Booth@MartinVT.com
---------------------------------------------------------

-------Original Message-------

From: midrange-l@midrange.com
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2002 03:49:00 PM
To: midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject: RE: Use of a trigger...? is this areasonable?

Well yes, but you will probably have to change pert near everyone of your
existing programs - don't you think?

Rob Berendt
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin



"Booth Martin"
<Booth@MartinVT.com To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
> cc:

Sent by: Fax to:
midrange-l-admin@mi Subject: RE: Use of a trigger...? is this areasonable?
drange.com


01/24/2002 03:22 PM
Please respond to
midrange-l






--
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
But Rob, isn't that the whole point of field level security? So a
programmer can't just start DFU and read the President's salary and Y-T-D
fields? Isn't it supposed to stop on every record?



---------------------------------------------------------
Booth Martin http://www.MartinVT.com
Booth@MartinVT.com
---------------------------------------------------------

-------Original Message-------

From: midrange-l@midrange.com
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2002 03:12:19 PM
To: midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject: RE: Use of a trigger...? is this areasonable?

Richard,

Think of it this way. You have a traditional RPG program. You loathe
selecting fields with logical files or SQL. Now you read a file which
contains a field of which you are not authorized to - by the way it is this
field for every record. Therefore every read will be an error. The
workaround is to either create a view or logical file which omits these
secured fields, or avoid traditional RPG i/o and use SQL to
if superuser;
cursorstmt=Select keyfld, dtafld,secfld from myfile;
else;
cursorstmt=Select keyfld, dtafld from myfile;
endif;
c/exec sql
c+ prepare curstmt from :cursorstmt
c/end-exec
c/exec sql
c+ execute curstmt
c/end-exec

plus the matching logic for the fetch statement. Get the gist?


Rob Berendt
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin



"Richard B Baird"
<rbaird@esourceconsu To: midrange-l@midrange.com
lting.com> cc:
Sent by: Fax to:
midrange-l-admin@mid Subject: RE: Use of a trigger...? is this areasonable?
range.com


01/24/2002 02:49 PM
Please respond to
midrange-l







Am I crazy, or didn't I hear something about "field level security" being a
new feature on the 400 several years ago? I've never used it, never seen
it used and I heard it had a fairly significant performance hit.

if true though, couldn't that be used for your ferpa problem?

ok, maybe i am crazy...

rick


---original message---
This is an existing application with lots of existing programs and queries.
The records are (and should be) available for totaling, counts, reports,
and
internal use. FERPA has to do with releasing private information to the
public. Creating the new logicals is a solution of sorts but creates many
problems with day to day use of the data.

The issue isn't so much security as it is "appropriate use". Some sort of
as-yet undefined business-rule process has to take place. There are people
already working on solving the business rule problem but my task is to
implement the business rule once they've written the rules. It appears to
me that I have to find some way to attach the business rules to the data
itself, not overlay a simplistic mask on the data. A logical view solution
seems easy to implement but impossible to live with.

Thank you all for this discussion. Its being very helpful to us here.



_______________________________________________
--
[ Content of type image/gif deleted ]
--