|
Well, ideally CPW rates should directly correlate to the amount of work you can get done, right? But MHz, well, you know the drill. It's a piece of the puzzle. Which brings us around to the desktop phenomenon of upgrading the OS and discovering that brings down the "CPW" of the PC to a point where a higher MHz processor needs to be installed. If this same sort of event is what was driving new iSeries sales (or upgrades, rather) then that would point to a lack of expanding market. thomas@inorbit.com wrote: >On Tue, 22 January 2002, Chris Rehm wrote: > >>But when a company upgrades to a new machine that has 2, 4, 8 or more >>times the performance of the old one, my question would be: Did the >>company's business volume grow by the same amount? Is the latest version >>of the operating system so inefficient that the new computing power is >>needed? >> > >Interesting point. I wonder how this relates to the viability of a measurement >of CPW vs. something like Mhz? > >Tom Liotta > -- Chris Rehm javadisciple@earthlink.net Beloved, let us love one another: for love is of God; and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God. 1 John 4:7
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.