But also look at a lot of what their R&D is based on.

IBM: Hardware
MS: Software ... with a significant amount devoted to user interface
development.

It seems the hardware based R&D would "show" larger impact.  When was the
last time we say any thing software oriented that was "revolutionary"?

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Mangham" <randy.mangham@home.com>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: IBM Claims Patent Crown Again


> To be fair, MS did patent some seemingly inventive things as well (and IBM
> did patent a few things that don't sound that complex) but most of MS's
> patents don't seem that dramatic compared to the research performed at IBM
> especially given that MS's R&D budget is nearly the same as IBM's. I'm
> willing to bet that IBM's R&D $ yield more real invention than MS's $ do.
>
>
> Randy Mangham
> Pacific Crest Consulting
> San Diego CA






As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.