I agree with Paul.  If speed is not a concern and you do not want to impact
performance, I'd use good old SNADS.

Carl J. Galgano
EDI Consulting Services, Inc.
550 Kennesaw Avenue, Suite 800
Marietta, GA  30060
(770) 422-2995 - voice
(419) 730-8212 - fax
AS400 EDI, Networking, E-Commerce and Communications Consulting and
Premium Ice Cream Brands shipped Overnight
FREE AS/400 Timesharing Service -
"You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know" - rw

How 'bout 2 programs:  At the sending end, it does a DSPOBJD to an
outfile, reads the outfile, and saves each object -individually- to a
tiny SAVF.  Then send the SAVF to the other end.

At the receiving end, RSTOBJ to the receiving library.

This avoids the problem of duplicating the entire library to a save file.

For sending, how 'bout SNADS and SNDNETF over an SNA link.  SNADS
guarantees that the object will get there.  Eventually.  (:

--Paul E Musselman

o post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.