|
From: Chuck Lewis <clewis@iquest.net> > You know Jan, the timing of this is great (for me) because we are on a > 620-2179 and at V4R1 CFINT never seemed to do much when viewed via > WRKSYSACT. I upgraded to V4R5 in November and just noticed today (via > WRKSYSACT) that unless I was seeing things, the % for CFINT seemed to be > jumping around and it was NOT in V4R1... (? ? ?). > > I was always under the impression that the 620-2179 was "immune" > from this ? > > Comments, anyone ? :-) The 620 does not have different interactive and batch CPW, so in that sense CFINT shouldn't penalize you. But CFINT is also used for other things (normal interrupt handling). Furthermore, some of the scheduling algorithms have been changed from V4R1 to V4R5, so maybe that is what you are seeing. What is typical CFINT%? 5%, 10%, 20%, 50%, ...
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
