Re: code optimization was: Trivia: Processor MHz -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: code optimization was: Trivia: Processor MHz
From: "James W. Kilgore" <eMail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 13:21:53 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Progressive Data Systems, Inc.

Hey, at this speed it's got to go with the best bang for buck: 5250

Leif Svalgaard wrote:
>
> From: James W. Kilgore <eMail@James-W-Kilgore.com>
> > I have a client using a model 200, yes, that's right, a CISC model 200,
> (what's
> > that? a 66mhz CPU?) with 12 users receiving sub second response time
> against
> > 30gb of 3rd normal form data.  All day long, every day, for six years.
> >
>
> now are they 5250 based or have they all been Webfaced?
>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.