|
Sorry, Leif Analogy no good... There are roughly equivalent alternatives, which is why the iSeries loses some customers to *nix and NT. IBM is balancing that against the price on the 400... Wouldn't be a problem to IBM, except that if they lose TOO many 400s, and they don't go to pSeries or xSeries, they lose (profits). Plus, it just so happens that x/pSeries don't have the margins. But then you also have to factor in Software Group, Services Group revenues (which are highly profitable) that they get from x/p... jt | -----Original Message----- | From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com | [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Leif Svalgaard | Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:11 PM | To: midrange-l@midrange.com | Subject: Re: Changed to: Interactive Tax | | | From: Adam Lang <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com> | | > They are not a monopolist. Proprietary, yes, monopolist, no. There are | > alternatives, it just involves up front investment to move to it. | > | then Standard Oil was not a monopolist: there were alternatives: horse | and buggy.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.