My point exactly. That is the idea behind open source. Not having to redo code already existent. If IBM took all the developers working on Netserver and had them work on Samba instead, it would be a large benefit. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Goodbar, Loyd (AFS-Water Valley)" <LGoodbar@afs.bwauto.com> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 2:42 PM Subject: RE: Samba (was: OS-X vs. Windows) > In one of the interviews I read with the Samba developers, that say that the > Samba code is, in a word, nasty. This is not the Samba team's fault > necessarily, but is rather a combination of reverse-engineering the > Microsoft protocol and "kludges" to make it work bug-for-bug compatible. It > seems to me that the Samba team and IBM are doing the same work twice. To my > knowledge, the protocol is undocumented outside Microsoft. > > Not to slam the IBM developers in any way, but I'm amazed that IBM got SMB > working on the AS/400 as quickly as it did. IIRC, the Samba team has been > working on theirs since 93-94. If Samba works with OS/2, then I believe IBM > should give serious thought to helping port Samba to the AS/400. > > Loyd
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.