That's the beauty of Open Source. Nothing is stopping you. And if a decent go is made of it, IBM may contribute and use it to replace Netserver and then you got them helping out the Samba crew also (or as it sounds, Samba helping them :P). The odd thing is, is that IBM hasn't looked at teh Samba code to see how they are handling the protocol and adapted their software accordingly. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Coulter" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: <email@example.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:14 PM Subject: Re: Samba (was: OS-X vs. Windows) > Perhaps an AS/400 port of Samba would be the go? I know it would suffer in > performance being implemented above the MI but surely it couldn't be any > slower than NetServer itself? And if it supported any SMB client then that > may mitigate the performance aspect. Who's interested? > > Regards, > Simon Coulter.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.