|
> > If you read the thread, I carefully separated data > > into two categories: secured and unsecured. This > > is a real and vital differentiation. > > My idea of data is what you put in a database, records and fields. In my > experience, the amount of data used for marketing and public awareness is > minimal. Are you thinking otherwise? Or would you agree that there is a > desire to protect the vast majority of data? Perhaps a different terminology is needed for information or presentation that does not need protection. I personally think it is a black eye for a web site to be defaced by hackers, but I agree that it might be less expensive to just periodically replace what is there with what you had in some backup. I also agree that it is much more expensive to cope with having your core data corrupted or stolen than say being a simple denial of service attack victim. MacWheel99@aol.com (Alister Wm Macintyre) (Al Mac)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.