> From: rob@dekko.com
> And how, pray tell, would you have a batch program, like RUNRMTCMD, access
> your 400?  Force it to only run interactive and prompt the userid and
> password?

There are certainly many options, but one thing I probably would NOT do is
allow RUNRMTCMD.  Instead, I'd probably have a program that listened on a
specific port for a request.  The program would only allow requests from
certain trusted addresses.  This would all be on an internal non-addressable
network (all with 10. addresses).

It would be a little more programming to add a new request, but that far
outweighs the security risks inherent with allowing unfettered access to
programs from a client.  Of course, you can attribute this whole discussion
to my view of distributed programming; I believe that centralized control of
servers by the host is preferable to unbounded access by clients.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.