|
> This ability to change the underlying physical layout (including, for > example, the fact that a file is physically moved to another machine, or > even another data format entirely) is the primary reason that a > message-based architecture is so preferable to ODBC. This must be peculiar to IBM's ODBC for the AS/400. It's totally unfamiliar to me. I only did one program a while back that did ODBC to the AS/400. ODBC is not position dependent in any implementation that I know about. > In any event, with a server, I can change the table name and the column > names (or, as I pointed out, the machine that the data is located on, or > even the actual data representation, such as from EBCDIC to ASCII). All I > have to do is modify my server accordingly, and the client does not change. Well ,it seems to me that with programming you can decouple the data representation at any level you choose.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.