|
Steve: On Mon, 12 November 2001, "Steve Richter" wrote: > Client server via dtaq is more complex that the pgm call because the pgmr > must be knowledgable of 7 steps compared to 4 in the common module pgm call > approach. I have no disagreement as far as that goes. However, to put this into a "business programmer" context, how do you propose to resolve the problem by using the pgm call approach when it takes 100CPW interactive and you only are given 50CPW by your management and there's 500CPW batch not being used? Suddenly the number of steps that must be known by the programmer goes way beyond the basic 4, though it can be limited if they use a C/S approach instead. This effectively is the business problem that many are being asked to resolve by programming around it. It's irrelevant that "business programmers" _SHOULDN'T_ need to address the issue; in the real world, they often _MUST_ address the issue. Many shops don't have a development group and a comm group and a systems group, etc. They have a couple programmers that do it all and they don't get to set budgets either. Tom Liotta -- Tom Liotta The PowerTech Group, Inc. 19426 68th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Phone 253-872-7788 Fax 253-872-7904 http://www.400Security.com ___________________________________________________ The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe Better! Faster! More Powerful! 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now! http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.