|
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:36:25 -0500 "Walden H. Leverich" <WaldenL@TechSoftInc.com> wrote: --snip-- > PS. Actually, ODBC is dead. OLE/DB is the new > replacement. However, I see > them used interchangeably. don't let IBM ODBC support hear you say that. On the comp.sys.ibm.as400.misc newsgroup, the problem is (occording the the ODBC team) is that we don't know how to create efficient databases. Just search groups.google.com for "ODCB bottleneck" and you should find the thread. Brad
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.