|
Fiona, > We backup changes , without the access paths during the week, & do a full > SAVLIB *ALLUSR at weekends with access paths. > Should the nightly save changes job save access paths just like the weekly > full saves ? It depends (don't you hate that answer?). Which is more important, faster backups or faster recoveries. You make the call. Personally, I would opt for faster recovery and spend the extra time it takes to do the access path backups. If your backup window allows you to, you should do the same. > We've been using this strategy to minimise tape & offline batch-window > usage for 5 years, but I'm wondering if this is wrong for effective > disaster-recovery, when it slows down to rebuild them. Our application > files rarely change, only the pgms get upgraded weekly. Does anyone have an > opinion on the pros & cons of this ? Actually, your application files (and their associated access paths) change everyday. Every time someone Adds a record, deletes a record, or updates a key field in an access path, that access path changes- so there is value in backing up the access paths every night. jte -- John Earl johnearl@powertechgroup.com The Powertech Group www.powertechgroup.com Kent, Washington, USA +1 253-872-7788
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.