|
M Hello Doug, You wrote: >Personally, I like to use the default of MAXPOS(*NOMAX). But IBM, in their >infinite wisdom, sets lower limits on many of their commands. They do that for a reason. The reason is that they can insert new keywords where appropriate without breaking existing code. If all the keywords were positional then someone somewhere would code a CL program that way and IBM would have to put any new keywords at the end to avoid breaking that program. Forcing keywords for the less common parameters allows IBM to insert a new keyword next to a possibly related existing keyword. (Always presuming that the designer of the command actually has a clue about why this stuff is done the way it is.) Regards, Simon Coulter. «»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«» «» FlyByNight Software AS/400 Technical Specialists «» «» Eclipse the competition - run your business on an IBM AS/400. «» «» «» «» Phone: +61 3 9419 0175 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\ «» «» Fax: +61 3 9419 0175 mailto: shc@flybynight.com.au \ / «» «» X «» «» ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \ «» «»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.