RE: qntc userid in a production batch job

[Joel Fritz <JFritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I could be wrong, but I was under the impression that permissions for NT
shares are controlled entirely from the NT side.  I know that I can't change
anything using ops nav.

I think I'm trying to drive the car by using the steering wheel but ignoring
the accelerator, brake, and shift lever/clutch.  I need to read up on this
again.

I'd definitely like to be able to ignore the userid/password thing if I
could.  I just ran a test file transfer using the user parm on sbmjob and at
least I know that the copy works and takes a reasonable amount of time.
Thanks for your help.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Bipes [mailto:chris.bipes@cross-check.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 3:28 PM
> To: 'midrange-l@midrange.com'
> Subject: RE: qntc userid in a production batch job
>
>
> If *public is write only, any one can put something into the
> share.  You can
> define one share as "c:\whatever" shared as "newonly$$" which
> will hide it
> from users and public access is write only, no
> read/update/delete.  The
> AS400 program then writes to that share.  Now you define a
> second share over
> the same directory giving public exclude authority and what
> ever group of
> users the access they need.  No profile sync necessary.
>
> Christopher K. Bipes    mailto:ChrisB@Cross-Check.com
> Operations & Network Mgr  mailto:Chris_Bipes@Yahoo.com
> CrossCheck, Inc.                http://www.cross-check.com
> 6119 State Farm Drive   Phone: 707 586-0551 x 1102
> Rohnert Park CA  94928          Fax: 707 586-1884
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Fritz [mailto:JFritz@sharperimage.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 11:44 AM
> To: 'midrange-l@midrange.com'
> Subject: RE: qntc userid in a production batch job
>
>
> I think it could work this way, but one of the obstacles is
> that when we
> went to NT from Novell a few years back, the network userids
> were no longer
> the same as the 400 userids. I could give public access to
> the share on the
> NT box, but...  One way I know that works is to hard code a
> userid that
> exists in both worlds and has synchronized passwords in the
> USER parm of the
> SBMJOB command.  Seems that there could be a security
> problem, although I'm
> pretty ignorant in that area.
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>