RE: CA v3r1m2 vs. v3r2 differences

["Bale, Dan" <Dan.Bale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I figured the v3r1m2 & v3r2 CA's were so old that there'd be nothing to
search for.

Oh well, the only thing that needed fixing was the @#%$ed GUI signon
windows for each of the seven systems.  But now that I'm on NT, I can
"lock" my PC and not have to reboot as often (other than powering down
for the weekend), so I figure I can live having to suffer through that
once per week.

Otherwise, it ain't broke!

Dan Bale
IT - AS/400
Handleman Company
248-362-4400  Ext. 4952
D.Bale@Handleman.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rob@dekko.com [SMTP:rob@dekko.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:28 PM
> To:   midrange-l@midrange.com
> Subject:      Re: CA v3r1m2 vs. v3r2 differences
>
>
> It was my advice.  But, as you say, if it ain't broke don't fix it.
> Just
> we had so many problems with V3R1M2 that went away with V3R2M0.  And I
> think there were some Op's Nav enhancements also.
>
> I tried searching for 'How this has changed' kind of stuff and can't
> find a
> good hit.  Gotta get back to work.
>
> Rob Berendt