|
Being a Developer, I love woking on IBM platforms due to their consistency over the years ! Though Microsoft has got adorable GUI's, I didn't find the databases upto the mark, either disk eating Access or critical handling SQL server ! (the Informix tieup might make it better in future !). Anyway is DB2s are high performence datases with excellent features like page level locking, unlike Oracle ! just my 2 cents ! Ravi --- Douglas Handy <dhandy1@bellsouth.net> wrote: > Dave, > > >That is Paul Conte who wrote the db2/400 book and also Mike Otey.I > have > >followed > >these two and I "think" and am pretty sure that they prefer SQL > Server . > > I think you have your books mixed up. The only book on DB2/400 per > se which I'm > aware of that Paul worked on was "Database Design and Programming for > DB2/400", > written by Paul Conte alone and published in 1997 by Duke Press. At > the time, > V3R6 was current. (ISBN 1-882419-06-5) > > Later Paul Conte and Mike Cravitz co-authored "SQL/400 Developer's > Guide", also > published by 29th Street Press (formerly Duke Press). This book is > based on > V4R5 features, and came out October 1, 2000. (ISBN 1-882419-07-7) > > You seem to be thinking of either "SQL Server 7 Developer's Guide", > written by > Paul Conte and Mike Otey and published by Osborne McGraw-Hill on > October 1, 1998 > (ISBN 0-075525-48-2) or the update "SQL Server 2000 Developer's > Guide" which > came out December 1, 2000 (ISBN 0-072125-69-1). > > I suspect you read (or saw) one of the books on SQL Server, but not > the one > nearly simultaneously updated on SQL/400, and jumped to the > conclusion Paul must > prefer SQL Server. > > Still more recent are these quotes from Paul, published April 2001 in > an online > article on iseriesnetwork and titled "V5 Makes iSeries More > Competitive in > Database Arena". The article can be viewed at > http://www.iseriesnetwork.com/artarchive/index.cfm?fuseactionİòewarticle&CO_ContentIDİ9987 > > Here are two quotes from the article: > > "V5 continues to improve how DB2 UDB for iSeries stacks up against > other > databases within IBM’s DB2 family and against Oracle, Microsoft SQL > Server, and > other relational database management systems." > > "From this point on, there’s little that should hamper the > iSeries in > competing strongly against the other leading database platforms." > > Neither of these quotes specifically mentions what is his preference > or why, and > I don't want to put words in Paul's mouth. I just trying to set the > record > straight that Paul and Mike Otey did not co-author a book on DB2/400. > > Doug > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) > mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.