RE: QA testing: need to prove line by line

["alan shore" <SHOREA@xxxxxxxx>]

Ahh - the old, theres not enough time to do it right, but theres plenty of time 
to fix it afterwards philosophy.

>>> "Bale, Dan" <D.Bale@handleman.com> 09/13/01 01:31PM >>>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Did you misstate that?  Are you presuming I am in "production"?  As a
developer, I haven't really thought of myself in that fashion.

Anyway, FWIW, QA is just really starting up here.  We still have some
managers that have hot projects that can't afford delays because of QA.
It will be a slow, but deliberate, process.

Dan Bale
IT - AS/400
Handleman Company
248-362-4400  Ext. 4952
D.Bale@Handleman.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Fritz [SMTP:JFritz@sharperimage.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:24 PM
> To:   'midrange-l@midrange.com'
> Subject:      RE: QA testing: need to prove line by line
>
> This may not be a lot of help, but it seems to me that you're the
> wrong
> person to be doing this.  The QA group should be doing the testing
> without
> your being involved.  One of the first principles of QA is that the QA
> people should be totally independent from production.
_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.