|
Thanks Alexei. This was illuminating. ----- Original Message ----- From: Alexei Pytel <pytel@us.ibm.com> To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:07 AM Subject: Re: Timeslices > > This one is simple. > Save command does its front-end processing in a job, but real work is done > by LDxxxx task in a background. > Job stays in EVTW waiting a report from LDxxxx task. > This task has prioirity one less (numerically one more than your job). > Now if you have other jobs in a loop with a priority higher than LDxxxx > task, it will never have a chance to run. > If you turn dynamic priority scheduler on, this will not happen, because > looping jobs will get their priority lowered, and LDxxxx task will have its > priority bumped with a result that it will eventually run and do its job. > This is an excellent illustration why dynamic scheduler was introduced! > > Alexei Pytel > > "The better is the worst enemy of the good" > > > > > > "Leif Svalgaard" > <leif@leif.org> To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> > Sent by: cc: > midrange-l-admin@mi Subject: Re: Timeslices > drange.com > > > 08/30/2001 10:51 AM > Please respond to > midrange-l > > > > > > From: Alexei Pytel <pytel@us.ibm.com> > > It might happen because of dynamic priority scheduler. > > The DYNSCD is now turned off. I have three jobs looping (ALOOP). > Every second they show a screen (with no wait) and YIELD their timeslice. > Job 0007 is trying to save an object to a save file that already exists, > and I had to type "G" to tell it to Go ahead. After that, the save is stuck > in an EVTW. Job 0001 is sitting on a DSPW. I can interact with that > screen with no wait at all. (This is on V4R5). > > QBASE QSYS SBS .0 DEQW > DSP02 LSVALGAARD INT 1.1 CMD-WRKACTJOB RUN > QPADEV0001 LSVALGAARD INT .0 CMD-LSEXPLR DSPW > QPADEV0002 LSVALGAARD INT 7.2 PGM-ALOOP RUN > QPADEV0003 LSVALGAARD INT 8.6 PGM-ALOOP RUN > QPADEV0005 LSVALGAARD INT 7.3 PGM-ALOOP RUN > QPADEV0007 LSVALGAARD INT .0 CMD-SAVOBJ EVTW > QSYSSCD QPGMR BCH .0 PGM-QEZSCNEP EVTW > > If I "hold" jobs 0002, 0003, and 0005, the save finishes. But why was the > job stuck on the EVTW? > > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.