|
What I am incredulous about is the "it must be true, I read it on the internet" foundation you have used for your supporting evidence. Leif Svalgaard wrote: >From: Hall, Philip <phall@spss.com> > >>Chris wrote: >> >>>My belief is that nobody, or perhaps a very few somebodies, enters >>>into a research project or works to build a working model of a >>>technology for the purpose of filing a patent to stop that technology >>>from being used. >>> > >Phil, Chris is using "The Argument From Personal Astonishment" >This is sometimes known as the Argument From Complexity, or the >Argument From Ignorance, or the Argument From Incredulity. > >It has the form: >I don't understand (or I never heard) how this could happen. >Therefore it couldn't have. > >Maybe it is best to move the discussion to the new patents-junk-list. >We are way off topic. > >Leif > > > > >_______________________________________________ >This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list >To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com >To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, >visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l >or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com > > -- Chris Rehm javadisciple@earthlink.net If you believe that the best technology wins the marketplace, you haven't been paying attention.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
