|
> From: Leif Svalgaard [mailto:leif@leif.org] > > From: Hall, Philip <phall@spss.com> > > Chris wrote: > > > My belief is that nobody, or perhaps a very few somebodies, enters > > > into a research project or works to build a working model of a > > > technology for the purpose of filing a patent to stop > that technology > > > from being used. > > Phil, Chris is using "The Argument From Personal Astonishment" > This is sometimes known as the Argument From Complexity, or the > Argument From Ignorance, or the Argument From Incredulity. > > It has the form: > I don't understand (or I never heard) how this could happen. > Therefore it couldn't have. > > Maybe it is best to move the discussion to the new patents-junk-list. > We are way off topic. Maybe best to drop it altogether.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.