× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



More likely the PTF index has somehow been destroyed.
Try this (in a restricted state):
 DLTF       FILE(QUSRSYS/QAPZPTF4) 
 DLTF       FILE(QUSRSYS/QAPZPTF3) 
 DLTF       FILE(QUSRSYS/QAPZPTF2) 
 DLTF       FILE(QUSRSYS/QAPZPTF) 
 CALL       PGM(QPZSYNC) PARM(C) 

...Neil





Douglas Handy <dhandy1@bellsouth.net>
Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
2001/08/14 11:09
Please respond to midrange-l

 
        To:     midrange-l@midrange.com
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: V3R2 LIC


Pete,

>when I did a  DSPPTF 5763999, it came up with no PTFs

I just checked a 200-2031 machine at V3R2, and 5763-999 definately showed 
a long
list of PTF's.  The highest numbers on that particular box were TL98139 
and
MF18809.  I don't know if MF18809 was part of the CUME or not.

The highest number for 5763-SS1 was TC98139.  All of these were 
permanently
applied.  There were numerous superceded TL's and TC's before them.

I believe 98139 was the last CUME issued for V3R2.

Did the account never load a CUME?  That's scary.  At least they aren't on 
V3R1
without a CUME...

Doug






As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.