Re: Enough grunt for v4r5?

[Pat Barber <mboceanside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Not applicable to the 9402-400.........

tomh@simas.com wrote:
> 
> Really, really, _really_ research the interactive processor feature...
> 
> Tom Hightower
> Solutions, Inc
> http://www.simas.com
> ------------
> If IBM had a nickle for every time CFINT kicked in... oh wait, they
> do...
> 
>  Matthias Oertli
>  <oertlim@s054.aone.net.au>                   To:
>  Sent by:                              midrange-l@midrange.com
>  owner-midrange-l@midrange.com                cc:
>                                               Subject:        Enough
>  08/01/01 04:10 AM                    grunt for v4r5?
>  Please respond to MIDRANGE-L
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We're looking at upgrading our box from v4r3 to v4r5 (just to get to a
> supported release).
> 
> The machine is a 9402 400 with processor feature 2131. We have 160MB
> of
> RAM and 24GB of disk with 16GB usable (combination RAID/MIRROR) of
> which
> about 54% is used. It's supporting mainly green screen/telnet
> interactive users (about 30) and a tiny bit of netserver stuff.
> 
> I wouldn't say we have performance problems, but response time
> sometimes
> is borderline, I would not want to see it get worse.
> 
> My question: if we go to v4r5 do I have to expect diminished
> performance? Greatly diminished performance?
> 
> If I was to upgrade the RAM to the maximum the box can take (I think
> about 224MB) would this make a big difference?
> 
> Thanks for your help.
> Best regards,
> Matthias
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---