|
From: <Ron@cpumms.com> > <<I don't get it. > <<It would seem to me that a reasonable (and correct?) and > <<fair way of doing this is to count the number of simultaneous > <<sessions (no matter who the users are and how they are signed > <<on and to what) that are USING MY APPLICATION at any time. > <<This is very easy to do. > > I agree, this is very easy to do (in fact it's currently what we do now) > but this is not what they want. If a user can use two sessions to gain > faster access to different parts of the application, why should we charge > him twice? Their argument is is that they are only on one session at a > time. > By golly, I got it ! ! ! Now, then your problem is to prevent users from ripping you off by all using the same user id. I can even see that. If I'm using your application on my terminal in my office and I go downstairs for some reason and need to access your application from a different terminal, then I would be charged twice. Maybe this happens so rarely that the customers don't complain about it, so counting physical terminals seems to be a reasonable compromise. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.