|
>Isn't the issue of this thread not the overall capacity >of a given iSeries but the inability, due to CFINT, >to shift capacity from batch to interactive >by tuning the system? Phil, Well said! In the days of yore, I used to have a dayshift/interactive subsystem configuration, where the memory pools were set to satisfy interactive demand and a nightshift/batch configuration where batch was optimised. >My impression is that >iSeries owners would prefer there to be **ONE** >CPW, and then leave it up to the owner to >tune it for batch, for interactive, for a mix, etc. I can understand this reasoning very well. Perhaps this is a good message to send to IBM marketing via iSeries Nation? Would you be willing to pay a premium for a system where you could control the mix? Or, get a discount for a governed one? The limit IS reality; how can we work with it in such a way that we can profit as well as IBM? One final thought: could the interactive/batch split CPW be designed as a way for IBM to fight the tendency for undersized systems to be sold? Buck +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact copyright@midrange.com.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.