|
It's funny, I don't remember any of the Windows ads, but I do remember the OS/2 ads. Actually, I just had a thought that maybe Bill is even more clever than I thought. First, he managed to get PC manufacturers to include DOS on every machine they sold. So right away you've got an uphill battle to convince management that something that's "free" should be replaced with something that costs $. Then comes the even sneakier part. It doesn't quite work. Is it a bug, or did I just do something wrong? What about all those other people that use it? They got it to work didn't they? It must be me. No, no way. That's obviously a bug. Now all I have to do is convince management... Or maybe it's simply the philosophy (which I've heard attributed to the Chinese) that you should not attain perfection -- there should be a few bugs for others to find so they won't feel so bad about you developing such a perfect product. I think the original scenario was newspaper editors leaving in a few typos or grammatical errors... Peter Dow Dow Software Services, Inc. 909 425-0194 voice 909 425-0196 fax ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nina Jones" <ddi@datadesigninc.com> To: <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 11:06 PM Subject: Re: Free OS/400 > > Criticism is character forming. I expect technical people to make > > technical decisions. If you are simply a user then you can ignore what I > > say. It was the bleating tone in your note that elicited my response. > > well, it wasn't meant to be bleating. > > we didn't start getting p/c's for everyone until later in the 90's. before that, > we had green screens. > > i do not have that much trouble with windows, but i know that some people do. > and i surely wouldn't want to run my business on the windows platform. > > about the time i got a p/c and retired my dumb terminal, os/2 was on it's last > legs. and i do not remember the better windows than windows ads. > > > Well, they tried the business oriented ads and you didn't buy, so they > > tried to be different (like the Mac) and that didn't work either. I think > > your argument is specious and you're a sucker for the marketing line. You > > don't want to make a desicion -- you want to be told what to do (but told > > nicely so you aren't aware of it). > > that's not true. if i was having problems i would have looked around. > > > It has always been obvious to those with open eyes and ears. MS are a > > first rate marketing organization and third rate software company. > > Microsoft make the gullible believe that what MS have is what you want > > rather than the reverse. IBM have never been very good at that. So you're > > quite happy to have MS tell you what to do so long as they do it nicely and > > hide the arrogance? Excuse me while I throw up ... > > i didn't say that at all. that i was quite happy with the way microsoft does > things. i think some of the things bill gates does is repulsive. but marketing is > where it's at. and timing. part of marketing is getting your message out when > the audience is ripe. and making them believe you have what they think they > need. agreed microsoft does a superb job of that. > > perhaps the better windows than windows ads were premature. they would have done > better in the late 90's when people were getting fed up with their systems > crashing. but if they were in the early 90's, most people (execs included) did > not yet have p/c's on their desks so ibm missed their audience. > > > I'm not going to continue this discussion any more. You and others on this > > list have been made aware of alternative operating systems, many of which > > have good application support. If you want a better desktop environment > > then put your money where your mouth is. Buy a Mac, buy eCommStation, buy > > a Linux distribution, and format the windows partition. It's your choice! > > But if you choose to stay with Winslop then don't winge. > > the point i was trying to make was that ibm did not make a good case for os/2 to > the general public. they even failed to make it to some of the ibm faithful. > that was all. > > nj > > +--- > | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. > | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com > +--- _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.