|
I have found from experience that an upgrade beyond V4R4 tends to have a performance impact on heavily used systems - particularly those low on memory, I would suggest that if these systems have any less than 192MB that you upgrade them - to 224MB or 256MB or more if posible. For V5R1 I'm not sure yet, but SUSPECT 256MB may be a minimum recommendation, which means some earlier RISC models that can't go beyond 192MB or 224MB, and are fairly heavily utilized, should seriously consider whether they want to go to V5R1 or not. For V5R2 IBM has made the decision for you on some first generation RISC models - they won't run V5R2. ...Neil "York, Albert" <albert.york@nissan-usa.com> Sent by: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com 2001/06/29 12:33 Please respond to MIDRANGE-L To: "'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'" <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> cc: Subject: RE: Performance problems after upgrading to V4R5 We upgraded from V4R2. This is the fourth system we have upgraded. The memory and processor group varies. Where would I find the latest DB grou ptfs? Thanks, Albert York -----Original Message----- From: Neil Palmer [SMTP:neilp@dpslink.com] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 8:45 PM To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Subject: Re: Performance problems after upgrading to V4R5 Albert, What release did you upgrade from, how much memory is on the 170, and what processor feature does it have ? I presume the latest PTF cum package and database group PTF's have been applied ? Neil Palmer DPS Data Processing Services Canada Ltd. 50 Acadia Avenue, Ste.102 OS/400~~~~~ Markham, Ontario, Canada. ____________ ___ ~ Phone:(905) 474-4890 x303 |OOOOOOOOOO| ________ o|__||= Cell.:(416) 565-1682 x303 |__________|_|______|_|______) Fax: (905) 474-4898 oo oo oo oo OOOo=o\ mailto:NeilP@DPSlink.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://www.DPSlink.com IBM iSeries The Ultimate Business Server "York, Albert" <albert.york@nissan-usa.com> Sent by: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com 2001/06/28 17:53 Please respond to MIDRANGE-L To: "'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'" <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> cc: Subject: Performance problems after upgrading to V4R5 Has any experienced any performance problems after upgrading to V4R5? We have a 170 which we upgraded on Sunday. Today the users are complaining that it is seriously slower than before (30 second response time). We have had similar problems with another 170 that we upgraded but not as bad as this. Albert York +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.