RE: Backing up the IFS - what actually gets backed up?

["Graap, Ken" <keg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Rob - 

You're right... QNTC is the OS/400 equivalent of an Microsoft SMB client. It
allows you to connect to other PC based servers in the network. It doesn't
work very well though! It is slow and there are several issues involved with
getting it to work right. One being that in order to connect to another
server, that server has to have a userid / password that is identical to the
AS/400 user requesting access through QNTC. 

Kenneth 

-----Original Message-----
From: rob@dekko.com [mailto:rob@dekko.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 7:34 AM
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Subject: Re: Backing up the IFS - what actually gets backed up?



Bruce, one of us, is totally misled.

Item 1)  QNTC.
My belief is that QNTC is NOT the storage for integrated netfinity servers
on the same 400.  My belief is that QNTC is used for the 400 to have access
to PC's within the network.  For example, if I have a PC named ROB in a
different building then I can do a CPY from /QNTC/ROB/... as long as the
400 user/pwd matches a user/pwd that has access to the share on that PC.
Now, my userid/pwd has administrator access to every PC in our network.
That's over 800.  If it didn't automatically exclude QNTC then I would be
backing up every PC in my organization when I saved the IFS.  I'd rather
continue to use ADSTAR to do this, thank you.

Item 2)  QFileSvr.400
If I do the following
MD '/QFileSvr.400/rmt400'
then
WRKLNK '/QFileSvr.400/rmt400/*'
Then I can see everything on the remote 400.  Therefore I would hope that
this gets automatically excluded, or in effect I am backing up two 400's
from one.


Rob Berendt

==================
A smart person learns from their mistakes,
but a wise person learns from OTHER peoples mistakes.


 

                    "R. Bruce Hoffman,

                    Jr."                       To:
<MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>                                         
                    <rbruceh@attglobal.        cc:

                    net>                       Subject:     Re: Backing up
the IFS - what actually gets backed up?       
                    Sent by:

                    owner-midrange-l@mi

                    drange.com

 

 

                    06/28/2001 07:25 AM

                    Please respond to

                    MIDRANGE-L

 

 





-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Dow <pcdow@yahoo.com>
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
Date: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 6:52 PM
Subject: Backing up the IFS - what actually gets backed up?


>My question is, what about other servers that are accessible via the IFS?
>Does the command
>
>SAV DEV('/QSYS.LIB/media-device-name.DEVD') |
> | |       |                |       OBJ(('/*') ('/QSYS.LIB' *OMIT) +
>|
> | |       |                |           ('/QDLS' *OMIT)(1) +
>|
> | |       |                |           ('/QIBM/ProdData' *OMIT) +
>|
> | |       |                |           ('/QOpenSys/QIBM/ProdData' *OMIT))
>+|
> | |       |                |       UPDHST(*YES)
>
>which is run by option 23 of the SAVE menu, backup any attached NT
servers?
>What about servers connected via QFileSvr.400?  The Backup/Recovery Guide
is
>less than forthcoming about this.
>

Yes, so long as the server is varied off during the save. The space
(physically) in QNTC is not really what you are after.  The QFPNWSSTG is
the
space your after. In either event, the omits above a specifically omit QSYS
(saved by normal library saves) QDLS (saved by SAVDLO) and IBM  product
information in the directories (don't store anything there thinking it's
PRODUCTION instead of PRODUCT <vbg>)


>I would guess that they're automagically omitted instead of having to be
>explicitly omitted as /QDLS is in the above command, but I don't know and
I
>don't see any documentation that says so.
>

No, they are automatically included.


>When I tried to backup an object from a QNTC NT server, I got an error
>stating that QSECOFR was not authorized to the NT server. Presumably if
she
>had been, it would've worked. How about with QFileSvr.400?

Again, why QNTC? It's just a lump, a heap. And what about QFileSvr.400?
Without OS/2, I don't think (pretty sure) anything goes in here. That was
the space for OS/2. But the data actually showed on QFPNWSSTG, like the NT.




+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---




+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---