× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: 250 libraries again (was V3R1 QUSRTOOL, *PRDLOD)
  • From: Jim Damato <jdamato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 18:41:51 -0500

I'm kind of sorry I brought it up.

Still I don't see this as a real problem.  IBM hasn't broken anyone's code.
Folks running legacy code can still run it as long as they recognize that a
25 library user library list is part of the legacy.

Any solution IBM might offer would have to prevent the original code from
bombing in the event that the user library list grew longer than the
variable in the old program.  This amounts to either allowing the list to be
truncated or creating a mode bit to be carried through every aspect of work
management to conditionally allow the list to be truncated.

If I were to suggest any change it would be at the system level.  Provide a
system value that establishes 25 or 250 libraries in the user library list.
If it were set at 250 the QUSRLIBL be open to more than 25 libraries.
SBMJOB, CHGLIBL, etc. and JOBD commands would be opened accordingly.  Those
RTVJOBA programs using a 275 character variable would bomb the moment they
encounter a job with more than 25 libraries.  If the system value were set
to 25 libraries the QUSRLIBL would have to first be trimmed to 25 libraries
or less.  The old RTVJOBA programs could run without fear of error, however,
any job encountering a new CL statement, JOBD, or other reference to more
than 25 libraries would bomb.  No truncation would be permitted.

If you've compromised your environment by running unsupportable software is
it really a big deal to have to live with a 25 library user library list
forever?  I don't think IBM should put much development effort into letting
this type of customer have their cake and eat it too.  They have a bigger
job to do just trying to remain (or become) competitive.

-Jim

James Damato
Manager - Technical Administration
Dollar General Corporation
<mailto:jdamato@dollargeneral.com>


-----Original Message-----
From: York, Albert [mailto:albert.york@nissan-usa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 5:05 PM
To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
Subject: RE: 250 libraries again (was V3R1 QUSRTOOL, *PRDLOD)


From what I have been reading, it looks like this would be a problem only
for those sites which don't have the ability to change their programs but
will still insist on using more than 25 libraries in their library list.
This sounds like a small group to me and I think IBM took the right
approach.

However, there is a simple solution. Create a version of RTVJOBD that does
what is needed and put it in the library list above QSYS. With all the
talent on this mailing list, I bet someone could come up with it in a couple
of hours. Instead of a new value on the job description use the job
switches. I don't think they are used for much else.

Albert York     


        -----Original Message-----
        From:   barsa@barsaconsulting.com [SMTP:barsa@barsaconsulting.com]
        Sent:   Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:45 PM
        To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
        Subject:        RE: 250 libraries again (was  V3R1 QUSRTOOL,
*PRDLOD)


        I thought that I answered this before.

         A new job attribute should be created called User Library List
Length
        (USRLIBLLEN ).  '0' would be 25 and '1' would be 250.  Jobs would
get this
        job attribute when submitted from a job description, or it could be
change
        with CHGJOB.  The *JOBD would be populated from *SYSVAL at *JOBD
creation
        time, not execution time.

        I have 3 sentences left!  A technical nit:  This change needs to be
        propagated into the System/38 environment.

        Al

        Al Barsa, Jr.
        Barsa Consulting Group, LLC

        400>390

        914-251-1234
        914-251-9406 fax

        http://www.barsaconsulting.com
        http://www.taatool.com





        

                            Jim Damato

                            <jdamato@dollargene        To:
"'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'" <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>             
                            ral.com>                   cc:

                            Sent by:                   Subject:     RE: 250
libraries again (was  V3R1 QUSRTOOL, *PRDLOD)        
                            owner-midrange-l@mi

                            drange.com

        

        

                            05/29/01 04:39 PM

                            Please respond to

                            MIDRANGE-L

        

        





        The point is that some folks with dinosaurs and legacies can't
recompile.
        They either have lost source, don't have compilers, or are
supporting
        packages that did not provide source and removed observability.  I'm
sure
        there are lots of users running applications where the support has
lapsed
        or the provider has gone out of business.  Al and others are
suggesting
        that an OS/400 enhancement should "do no harm".  In this situation
the
        users' programs will crash due to an OS enhancement.

        I'm curious, Al.  What should IBM have done?  How would you have
        implemented an extension to the user library list?  Please answer in
7
        sentences or less :)

        -Jim



        James Damato
        Manager - Technical Administration
        Dollar General Corporation
        <mailto:jdamato@dollargeneral.com>


             -----Original Message-----
             From: Leland, David [mailto:dleland@Harter.com]
             Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:10 PM
             To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
             Subject: RE: 250 libraries again (was V3R1 QUSRTOOL, *PRDLOD)



             So, what you're saying is that if you changed the user portion
of your
             library list to have more than 25 libraries in it, you'd be
satisfied
             to have an existing program only retrieve the first 25 using
the
             RTVJOBA command?  All for the sake of not having to recompile
your CL
             program?  Sheesh.  Think of the mess that could cause?


             As I mentioned before, you only need to fix your CL programs if
you
             start using more than 25 libraries in your library list.


             Dave


             -----Original Message-----
             From: Goodbar, Loyd (AFS-Water Valley)
[mailto:LGoodbar@afs.bwauto.com
             ]
             Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:18 PM
             To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
             Subject: RE: 250 libraries again (was V3R1 QUSRTOOL, *PRDLOD)





             I wonder why IBM didn't add an additional parameter to the
RTVJOBA
             command
             call LUSRLIBL (long user *LIBL). That way no existing code
needed
             changing,
             and forced you to modify the program only if you needed the
additional

             libraries. Just like any other enhancement should work.
Lobotomies for
             all!


             <stuff snipped>


                              DCL        VAR(&USRLIBL) TYPE(*CHAR) LEN(275)
                              DCL        VAR(&CMD) TYPE(*CHAR) LEN(6000)
                              RTVJOBA    USRLIBL(&USRLIBL)
                              CHGLIBL    LIBL(MYLIB1 MYLIB2 QGPL QTEMP)


                 /*  Do my thing, sing my song, yada, yada, yada
             */


                              CHGVAR     &CMD ('CHGLIBL LIBL(' *CAT &USRLIBL
*TCAT
             ')')
                              CALL       PGM(QCMDEXC) PARM(&CMD 6000)


             <snip>


             For this brilliant enhancement, we provide no award.  The
people who
             dreamt
             this up have obviously already been to Mayo for their
lobotomies.


             I cannot believe that for the first time in 22 years, you have
gone
             out of
             your way to break certain users code, and I urge you to add the
             appropriate
             support to the system to avoid this.


             Al


             Al Barsa, Jr.
             Barsa Consulting Group, LLC
             +---
             | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
             | To submit a new message, send your mail to
MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
             | To subscribe to this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.

             | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
             MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
             | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
             david@midrange.com
             +---







        +---
        | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
        | To submit a new message, send your mail to
MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
        | To subscribe to this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
        | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
        | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
        +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.