|
|
Phil,
I've not done this myself, but I was at an IBM
conference not too long after the 170 was released. They had testimony
from a client that had taken a Java application that was running on 12 (if I
recall correctly) NT servers and replaced them with a single 170. The
application was a web spider and they had to reboot the NT servers at least once
per day, due to the less than perfect garbage collection in MS's Java
implementation. Of course the 170 did a better job, reduced
administration, and did not run out of memory like the NT servers.
Now the real questions: Was this
something that the client could have done on their own? Did IBM do a lot
of work for the client because it would make a great testimonial and help them
sell the 170 as a great Java server? I don't know the
answers.
Chuck
|
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
