Re: Backup enhancement (???)

["Steve Richter" <srichter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>
>Probably the most reasonable request to IBM would be to do SAVSYS to save
>files.  However SAVSYS writes a series of tape files, and the current save
>file implementation is one tape file per *SAVF.  As a *SAVF is really just
>like a single member 528 byte PF, it might be reasonable to ask IBM to
>implement a multimembered SAVF, however IMHO, I do not think that they will
>feel that this is not strategic enough for their investment..
>
>Al
>


would a multivolume savf also enable:
    savlib ( lib1 lib2 ... )  dev(*Savf)
    or savlib (*all) dev(*Savf)  ??

    and  would it also enable an unattended release install from a savf?

If so, does that justify the investment?

I'll do it for 50k.

Steve Richter



+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---