Re: Interactive vs. Batch (was Did IBM finally roll out SAA with Webs phere?) -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


>Am I wrong on any of this?  Is there a better way of looking at
Interactive
vs. Batch?<

Jim

I think it isn't a question of how the machine handles the load or
performance.
It is the fact that webfacing runs as an interactive job and that You get
Charged $$ for the amount of your interactive capacity.   If it ran as a
batch job, it would cost you less.

John Carr

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.