× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re[2]: What counts as technically slick?
  • From: "Todd Sabella" <Todd.Sabella@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 16:39 -0500

hese are my sentiments exactly!  I one thought out and designed a 
whole system for calling a seperate "library of functions" to access 
a file, and in the end came to the conclusion that this wouldn't buy 
me ANYTHING but complexity.
     
The externally defined files ALREADY provide you with as much of a 
layer of independence from I/O operations as these external routines 
do!
     
I guess I could see doing this if I thought the files would soon be 
located on another computer, on another platform, where I'd save the 
work of re-writing all of the programs involved.   But how often does 
something like this ever happen?   It never has, for me.
     
     
     
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, York, Albert wrote:
     
> On the surface it seems like a good idea, but what have you gained? 
>
> I still have to define the record in my program, so if the file changes I 
> still have to change all the programs that use that file.
>
> Also, if I do the READ in my program, it's obvious what I am doing, and 
> error handling is pretty straight forward. If I call a separate program 
> which does the READ, what have I gained? I have all the overhead of a
> program call and no clear advantage, that I can see. All you're doing is 
> adding one more layer of complexity.
>
> The only place where a program like this would be useful is if it is called 
> from a CL program.
>
> Albert York
>
     
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. 
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. 
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com 
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.