|
From: John Taylor <john.taylor@telusplanet.net> > Is it just me, or does anyone else wonder these tests are supposed to prove? > You're comparing 150's to 170's to 270's etc, all with various (unnamed) > processors and active workloads. One guy does the RPG version on "System A", > another does the C version on "System B", and so forth. What use could such > results possibly have? good point, of course, but what the tests show so far is that most of them are in the same general ballpark. Once we a say a Java solution, it's time to run them all on the same system. I'll be happy to do so. But let's get the code snippets first. This whole thing started because it was stated without any substantiation that "Java was much better than RPG for string manipulation". Soon we can compare code and maybe even do a timing test. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.