|
> >I don't agree, however, that the AS/400 is a Corvette or > >a Merc, or Lexus, or anything else. Today, except for > >speed and ease of use, all computer hardware is > >interchangeable. Only the application of software > >makes it different. > I totally disagree. I think MS would like us to think so, as well as the big hardware dealers, Dell, Compaq, etc. But I see tremendous differences (and problems) in reliability and compatibility in the pc network area. The same in unix. And every time a customer has taken the approach that even the 400 will talk to "anything" has been a pain. It is all things, hardware, OS, and applications that make a good, reliable system. And I still think Rochester does it better than anyone (just wish they could keep up with the pace of the rest of the world), but then quality does take time. One way to move the iSeries forward, is for IBM to show (not us, but the world) the amazing successes and reliability of the system (and I do mean "system" of hardware, OS, and applications. Cult of the 400 jim +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.