|
It will bypass those files if you specify SAVACT(*SYSDFN) SAVACTWAIT(30) in the SAVCHGOBJ command. Although I will admit that we are NOT backing up QUSRSYS but rather just the libs that have changes, we QUSRSYS monthly in a restricted state.
-----Original Message-----
From: Edward Koziol [mailto:koziol@chaney.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 10:43
To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
Subject: RE: Save-while-active of QUSRSYS versus Management Central
Thanks! I had this problem occur on a client system and used this command
to bypass their problem. Another client runs a long running commitment
control application that prevents the SWA from completing normally. Our
tape management software does allow us to resume the backup, but not until
after this application completes.
IF IBM IS LISTENING!
WOULDN'T ONE THINK THAT IBM WOULD JUST BYPASS THE FILES IT CAN'T SAVE AND
CONTINUE ON WITH THE PROCESS????
It makes sense to me!
ED
-----Original Message-----
From: rob@dekko.com [mailto:rob@dekko.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 8:38 AM
Subject: Save-while-active of QUSRSYS versus Management Central
Thought I'd forward this on to you. Had to modify backup program on GDWEB:
------------- 9 data records excluded --------------------------------
/* 02/14/01 by R.Berendt, CDP GDS,LLC */
/* We were getting message CPF377F while doing a */
/* save-while-active of QUSRSYS. Job causing problems was */
/* QYPSSRV - Management Central. Opened pmr 67809,500 */
/* with IBM. IBM recognized this problem and recommended */
/* that we stop/start the tcp server for management */
/* central. */
------------ 94 data records excluded --------------------------------
/*
| Stop tcp server for management central to avoid message CPF377F
| while doing save-while-active of QUSRSYS.
*/
ENDTCPSVR *MGTC
------------- 8 data records excluded --------------------------------
/*
| Start tcp server for management central after doing
| save-while-active of QUSRSYS.
*/
STRTCPSVR *MGTC
------------ 47 data records excluded ------------------
I am not a big fan of throwing in MONMSG's everywhere. I am seeing too
much code with them and frankly I doubt the integrity of the data on some
of our backups and production programs due to this.
Rob Berendt
==================
Remember the Cole!
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.